Share
A Saga of Exclusionary Practices: Systemic Hindrances in Obtaining a Certificate of Legal Practice in India- Part III
Tanvi Singh ,
Nivedita Dalal,
Gatha Namboothiri
Affiliation: Centre for Social Justice, Ahmedabad, India
Keywords: Law, India, All India Bar Examination (AIBE), Bar Council of India (BCI), Legal Practice, Advocate
Categories: News and Views, Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
DOI: 10.17160/josha.9.4.838
Languages: English
This is the third part of a three-part article that seeks to critically examine the All India Bar Examination, one that law graduates need to necessarily pass to practice law in India. In the second part (which can be found here), the authors brought to light the issues of the centralised All India Bar Examination such as the fee and associated costs along with the unfamiliar methods and processes of the exam in itself. The first part can be found here. In the current third and last part of the article, we highlight the poor quality of questions papers in the only qualifying examination for legal professionals in India. We also address the inadequate grievance redressal system of AIBE. This article was first published in LiveLaw (https://www.livelaw.in/columns/all-india-bar-examination-aibe-bar-council-of-india-bci-197405) in April 2022.