A Saga of Exclusionary Practices: Systemic Hindrances in Obtaining a Certificate of Legal Practice in India- Part II
Tanvi Singh ,
Nivedita Dalal,
Gatha Namboothiri
Affiliation: Centre for Social Justice, Ahmedabad, India
Keywords: Law, India, All India Bar Examination (AIBE), Bar Council of India (BCI), Legal Practice, Advocate
Categories: News and Views, Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
DOI: 10.17160/josha.9.3.830
Languages: English
This is the second part of a three-part article series that seeks to critically examine the All India Bar Examination, one that law graduates need to necessarily pass to practice law in India. In the first part (which can be found here), the authors brought to light the issues of exorbitant registration fee and other costs related to the AIBE. In this article, we have attempted to map out the complex and inaccessible processes associated with the Bar enrolment such as lack of uniform and outdated guidelines and ambiguities in break-up of fees. It also captures an unpopular narrative regarding the hindrances faced by non-English/non-urban candidates in attempting an open book exam with an OMR answer sheet. This article was first published in LiveLaw (https://www.livelaw.in/columns/all-india-bar-examination-aibe-bar-council-of-india-bci-197405) in April 2022.