Share
The Judicialization Process in Social Assistance: An Analysis of Open Socio-Educational Measures - O Processo de Judicialização na Assistência Social: Uma Análise das Medidas Socioeducativas em Meio Aberto
Valber Luiz Farias Sampaio
Affiliation: Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil
Keywords: Judicialization, Socio-educational measure in an open environment, CREAS and SUAS, Writing that comes from everyday life, Document Analysis.
Categories: Demetrios Project, Humanities, Social Sciences and Law
DOI: 10.17160/josha.11.5.1003
Languages: Portuguese
The judicialization process is a contemporary event, understood as a procedure by which the judiciary has gained relevance from the Legislative and Executive powers, that expresses many decisions at different levels, being requested by various social actors to accord in everyday life. In this regard, the mentioned process intervenes in the management of different behaviours of life, involving relationships through legal figures/operators. This process flows into public policies starting in production of subjects of rights with the Federal Constitution of 1988. However, this intrusion of the judiciary also has an intense impact on articulation when the juvenile protection is the topic. The present research aimed to analyze the practices that emerge in the face of a judicialization process, especially on Unified Social Assistance System (SUAS), carried out specifically in the Specialized Reference Center for Social Assistance (CREAS) in the Social Protection Service for Adolescents in Compliance with Measure Socio-educational (MSE) of Assisted Freedom (LA) and Provision of Services to the Community (PSC). It is known that the MSE's in an open environment propose to provide care to adolescents, and their respective families, face to determinations judged by some perpetrated act. In this sense, a historic-genealogical study is suggested, based on two principles of analysis. The first has documents as primary sources in the problematization and historicization of Social Assistance, such as the MSE in an open environment that is executed through it. These documents are understood here as events that produce differents aftereffects. Subsequently, writing that comes from daily is used, as an analytical flow, in order to present scenes that support the problematization of judicializing practices that operate and affect the teenages bodies, compliance with the MSE in an open environment, as well as their respective families. Therefore, the question is: how are the practices of judicialization in the Social Protection Service for Adolescents in fulfillment of MSE in an open environment? Aiming to analyze how the practices of judicialization operate in the Social Protection Service for Adolescents in Fulfillment of MSE, of CREAS; As well as, to problematize how Psychology practices are given in the Social Protection Service for Adolescents in enforcement of MSE in an open environment in CREAS; to analyze how the relationship between Social Assistance and the judiciary takes place, based on the proposal to monitor adolescents in compliance with the MSE in an open environment; to question the knowledge production, power and subjectivation through discourses and effects of truths in social control documents. Into this way, the PNAS constructions were problematized and how their practices are structured, especially with regard to the MSE in an open environment and how the rationality around the relationship of judicialization is constituted - as a government of conducts - amid the practices of Psychology in the CREAS, i.e. practices of psychological knowledge that would operate as a protective measure, often end up gaining a sense of judgment, surveillance and/or punishment.